Request for Proposals for Alternative Education Services No. LIT-AE-RFP-0002-2026
Education Development Center, Inc.
(Hereafter referred to as “EDC”)
Request for Proposals for the Procurement of
Alternative Education Training Services in Liberia
Date of Issuance:
March 2, 2026
Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) is an international nonprofit organization that develops, delivers, and evaluates innovative programs to address some of the world’s most urgent challenges. Our work includes research, training, educational materials, and strategy, with activities ranging from seed projects to large-scale initiatives. EDC enjoys a worldwide reputation for its excellence in program and fiscal management and for the impact of its work.
Mastercard Foundation’s Leaders in Teaching (LIT) initiative aims to transform secondary education across Africa by strengthening secondary-level teaching and learning so that young people have the 21st-century skills and competencies needed for employment, lifelong learning, and adult life. Working through a multi-partner implementation model, LIT is a holistic approach to enhancing teaching and learning, focusing on the following key programmatic pillars: 1) Teacher Recruitment, 2) Teacher Training, 3) Education Leadership and Management, and 4) Teacher Motivation.
This program aims to strengthen the quality of teaching and learning in secondary education in Liberia. Each program component under the respective LIT pillars will be implemented with a strong focus on inclusion and gender equity, addressing the unique needs of marginalized young women, youth with disabilities, and refugee students in underserved communities, and will be implemented through a strong partnership approach with the Ministry of Education, Education Development Center (EDC), and various local partners.
A component of LIT is Alternative Education, through which EDC partners with MOE and MOYS to create multiple pathways for learning and transition to work services for 3,000 overaged high school learners and out-of-school youth. It’s anticipated that youth benefiting from the AE intervention will be supported to either successfully re-enroll and/or complete junior high, senior high education, or TVET, and transition to employment opportunities through jobs or entrepreneurships. The initiative will prioritize high-impact, gender equitable, and inclusive innovations such as tutoring for overaged youth in the school system, Work Ready Now clubs and peer leadership initiatives, business pitch competition, and technical/vocational skills development building that benefit the youth.
Through this RFP process, EDC will identify and select up to three (03) local partners to implement the AE as per the detailed scope of work below. Upon selection, EDC will invite selected partners to revise the design/SOW through a co-creation workshop. The subaward will be for a total of 12 months with an anticipated start date of May 2026. Depending on grantee performance and demonstrated capacity, as well as the evolving needs of the LIT project, EDC may issue additional RFPs in subsequent years, either to solicit additional partners for the implementation or for additional technical services/activities to existing partners.
This RFP extends this invitation to a broad spectrum of entities within Liberia, including women-led organizations/associations, youth-led/serving organizations, and/or Disabled Persons’ Organizations and service providers. This encompasses but is not restricted to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local for-profit development entities, private sector youth-led organizations dedicated to women’s socio-economic empowerment, and business enterprises that are either registered as Liberian organizations. LIT places significant emphasis on inclusivity in its programming and encourages proposals that demonstrate a commitment to gender equity and disability inclusion, rural youth, refugees, or displaced youth. It expects clear strategies for achieving desired outcomes for traditionally marginalized segments of the population.
EDC anticipates granting multiple awards resulting from this RFP to applicants whose proposals align with the RFP’s guidelines and demonstrate the best technical approach, organizational capabilities, cost-effectiveness, organizational credibility, including compliance and demonstrated partnerships with government line ministries or relevant institutions, risk assessment results, and value for money.
EDC’s work on the Leaders in Teaching project is funded by the Mastercard Foundation (the Foundation); organizations submitting proposals in response to this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) have no relationship with the Foundation under the terms of this RFP or any resultant contract. All communications regarding this RFP must be directed to EDC.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this RFP is to invite prospective Offerors to submit a proposal to provide Alternative Education training and support to youth in order for them to successfully re-enroll and/or complete junior high, senior high education, or TVET, and transition to employment opportunities through employment or entrepreneurship in Liberia.
1.2 Eligibility
This procurement is open to offers from organizations that are legally registered in Liberia.
2.1 Original RFP Document
EDC shall retain the RFP, and all related terms and conditions, exhibits, and other attachments, in original form in an archival copy. Any modification of these, in the Offeror’s submission or subsequent contract, is grounds for immediate disqualification.
2.2 RFP Provisions
2.3 Schedule of Events
The following schedule applies to this RFP but may change in accordance with EDC’s needs or unforeseen circumstances. Changes in this timeline will be announced as formal modifications to the RFP.
| STEP # | TIME | DATE | STEP |
| 1 | 10 am – 1 pm (GMT) | March 5, 2026 | EDC will host a pre-submission workshop for interested Offerors at the Golden Key Hotel, RIA Highway |
| 2 | 5:00pm (GMT | March 6, 2026 | Deadline for requests for any clarifications from the EDC. Questions must be submitted in writing via email to LITinfo@edc.org |
| 3 | 5:00 pm GMT | March 9, 2026 | Estimated date for issuance of any clarifications by EDC. All Questions will be answered in one document, which will be sent to all Offerors who attend the pre-submission workshop or reach out to us regarding this RFP. |
| 4 | 5:00pm (GMT) | March 16, 2026 | Deadline for submission of proposals. |
2.4 Inspection and Acceptance
Under any contract awarded in response to this RFP, EDC may inspect and test the deliverables to determine whether such deliverables conform to the terms of the contract and its attachments. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by EDC, EDC shall have a right to inspect deliverables for conformity before payment or acceptance of such deliverables, in accordance with Section 2-513(1) of the UCC. Payment for deliverables made before inspection for conformity shall not constitute an acceptance of such deliverables or impair EDC’s right to inspect such deliverables or any of EDC’s remedies, in accordance with Section 2-512(2) of the UCC. Deliverables rejected or supplies in excess of quantities ordered may be returned to the selected Offeror at the selected Offeror’s expense.
3.1 Offeror’s Understanding of the RFP
In responding to this RFP, the Offeror fully understands the RFP in its entirety and in detail, including making any inquiries to EDC as necessary to gain such understanding. Clarification questions must be submitted by potential Offerors—in writing—by the date and time listed in Section 2.3, Step No. 1. Responses will be published in writing. EDC reserves the right to disqualify at its sole discretion any Offeror who submits a proposal that is not responsive or that demonstrates less than such understanding. That right extends to cancellation of the contract if a contract has been made. Such disqualification and/or cancellation shall be at no fault, cost, or liability whatsoever to EDC.
3.2 Communication
Verbal communication shall not be effective. In no case shall verbal communication govern over written communications.
Offerors who are unable to access the link to the RFP should reach out to the EDC/LIT Contracts team @ LITinfo@edc.org
Offerors’ inquiries, questions, and requests for clarification related to this RFP are to be directed in writing in English before the date and time listed in Section 2.3, Step No. 1 to:
Education Development Center, Inc.
Attention: EDC/LIT Contracts team
E-mail: LITinfo@edc.org
3.3 Proposal Submission
Proposals must be provided on the Offeror’s letterhead or stationery and must be delivered via email to:
Education Development Center, Inc.
Attention: EDC/LIT Contracts team
E-mail: LITinfo@edc.org
The technical proposal and the cost proposal must be sent in separate emails. Proposals must have the subject line of “Proposal in response to RFP No. LIT-AE-RFP-0002-2026 and must include the number of emails (for example, Email 1 of 2, Email 2 of 2, etc.) in the subject line. The Proposal itself must include all documents required by the RFP in Word, Excel, or PDF, and those documents must be attached to the email message(s); all attachments must be clearly labeled and must be numbered sequentially in order for EDC to review the Proposal. If the Proposal is sent in more than one email message, the Offeror must send all of the email messages with the Proposal submission on the same day and time as the sending of the emails as closely as practicable.
It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the proposal is delivered to EDC by the deadline date listed in Section 2.3, Step No. 3.
3.4 Complete Proposals
EDC will determine which proposals include the components required by the RFP and are considered to be a complete proposal. Please note that although EDC will determine certain proposals to be complete, this determination does not signify that an award will be made to one or any of the Offerors with complete proposals.
3.5 Minimum Requirements and Evaluation Criteria
3.5.1 Minimum Requirements
Offerors must meet the following minimum requirements:
Offerors that do not meet the minimum requirements listed above will not be considered eligible for potential funding and, therefore, proposals from these organizations will not be further evaluated. Proposals from organizations that meet the minimum requirements will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
3.5.2 Evaluation Criteria
The purpose of this RFP is to identify those organizations that have the interest, capability, and financial strength to supply the services identified in Section 4. EDC will evaluate proposals in accordance with this section and intends to award a contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to EDC. “Best value” is defined as the offer that results in the most advantageous solution for EDC, in consideration of technical, cost, and other factors.
The submitted technical information will be scored by a technical evaluation committee using the technical criteria shown below.
Technical Evaluation Criteria:
| Technical Criteria | Description | Maximum Points |
| Credibility of Organization and Management Capacity | A. Demonstrated organization credibility, institutional capability, and experience in delivering high-quality, relevant project activities. (5 pts) B. Identification and availability of facilities and resources. (5 pts) C. The organization has an established presence/office in the proposed locations. (5 pts) D. Strength and clarity of proposed management plan and staffing plan. (5 pts). | 20 |
| Technical Approach | E. Merit of the proposed plan for youth engagement and recruitment strategy. (10pts) F. Merit of proposed plan for training youth, including selection of trainers and conducting quality assurance. (10 pts) G. Merit of the proposed strategy for placing youth trainees in a work/training experience. (10 pts) H. Merit of the proposed strategy for youth employment transition support. (10 pts) I. Merit of the proposed sustainability plan and leverage of resources. (10 pts) | 50 |
| Project Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting Capacity | J. Adequate staffing to conduct monitoring, evaluation, and reporting. (5 pts) K. Clearly described procedures for monitoring and reporting activities. (5 pts) L. Experience administering quantitative surveys and learning assessments. (5 pts) | 15 |
| Cost Efficiency | M. Reasonableness of the cost of the activity. (5 pts) N. Clarity of the budget narrative. (5 pts) O. Value for money. (5 pts) | 15 |
| Total | 100 | |
Cost proposals will be evaluated, but will not be assigned a rating. The evaluation of cost will include a determination of cost realism, completeness, and reasonableness. Cost realism is defined as the Offeror’s ability to project costs that are realistic for the work to be performed; reflect a clear understanding of the requirements; and are consistent with the Offeror’s technical capacity.
Technical and cost will be evaluated relative to each other, as described herein. Technical is significantly more important than cost.
3.5.3 Competitive Range
EDC may establish a Competitive Range composed of only the most highly rated proposals. In certain circumstances, EDC may determine that the number of most highly rated proposals that might otherwise be included in the Competitive Range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted. Should that be the case, EDC may then limit proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated offers. EDC may exclude a proposal if it is so deficient as to essentially require a new technical proposal. EDC may exclude a proposal so unreasonably priced, in relation to more competitive offers, as to appear that there will be little or no chance of becoming competitive. EDC may exclude an offer requiring extensive discussions, a complete re-write, or major revisions, such as to allow an Offeror unfair advantage over those more competitive offers.
3.6 Selection
EDC is not obliged to award a contract on the basis of the lowest proposed cost, or to the Offeror with the highest technical evaluation merit. Although for this procurement, Technical Proposal merits are considered significantly more important than cost/price relative to deciding who might best perform the work, cost factors must also be considered. Therefore, after the final evaluation of proposals, EDC intends to issue the contract to the Offeror whose proposal offers the best value to EDC, considering both technical and cost factors. Further, EDC may award to a higher-priced Offeror if a determination is made that the higher technical evaluation of that Offeror merits the additional cost/price.
EDC may award one or more contracts resulting from this RFP to the Offeror(s) whose proposal(s) conform to this RFP and offer(s) the best value. EDC may also (a) reject any or all proposals, (b) accept other than the lowest proposal, or (c) accept more than one proposal. Contracts may be issued for some or all of the deliverables.
EDC may award a contract without discussions with the offerors. As such, Offerors are strongly encouraged to submit their best proposals with their original submissions. EDC reserves the right to site visits and/or to conduct discussions, which may result in revisions to proposals, with one or more than one or all Offeror(s) if EDC determines, at its sole discretion, that discussions are necessary. Discussions may include oral presentations provided by the Offeror.
4.1 Statement of Work and Specifications
All of the requirements listed in Section 4.1 must be met.
4.1.1 Statement of Work
Background
Mastercard Foundation’s Leaders in Teaching (LIT) initiative aims to transform secondary education across Africa by strengthening secondary-level teaching and learning so that young people have the 21st-century skills and competencies needed for employment, lifelong learning, and adult life. Working through a multi-partner implementation model, LIT is a holistic approach to enhancing teaching and learning, focusing on the following key programmatic pillars: 1) Teacher Recruitment, 2) Teacher Training, 3) Education Leadership and Management, and 4) Teacher Motivation. This partnership with Education Development Center (EDC) will support programming across all four pillars of the LIT model.
EDC coordinates and implements the LIT program in Liberia, which aims to strengthen the quality of teaching and learning in secondary education in Liberia. Each program component under the respective LIT pillars will be implemented with a strong focus on inclusion and gender equity, addressing the unique needs of marginalized young women, youth with disabilities, and refugee students in underserved communities.
Contextual background
Liberia faces a persistent challenge of over-aged and out-of-school youth. Approximately 45% of youth aged 15–24 are “Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET)”, and more than 60% of students enrolled at the junior and senior secondary levels are over-aged. While Adult Education (AE) programs provide an established policy-backed pathway to address this challenge, the current provision is limited in scale and coverage. In 2022, only 20 active AE sites were reported nationwide, serving 1,704 learners, following a sharp reduction from earlier donor-supported expansion. This constrained and uneven AE provision leaves many eligible youth without viable opportunities to complete basic education or prepare for employment.
The proposed AE intervention will respond to these gaps by supporting the recruitment and training of over-aged and out-of-school youth through existing AE structures. Implemented through competitively selected partners and in coordination with the Ministry of Education, the intervention will operate in counties where AE schools are already present. By strengthening access to alternative learning pathways and linking AE participants to skills development and employment opportunities, the intervention aims to improve learning outcomes and transition prospects for underserved youth, without creating parallel systems.
In support of the goals and objectives of the LIT, EDC intends to issue subawards through a competitive process to Liberian-based organizations to implement the AE in the LIT’s implementing counties. This Scope of Work (SOW) details how the selected Implementing Partners will implement activities to increase education, learning, and employment transition opportunities for youth.
The AE implementation will cover five (5) counties (Montserrado, Nimba, Grand Bassa, Margibi, and Bong) in Liberia and will leverage existing AE schools and initiatives from government and/or development partners. Applicants are welcome to apply for the designated counties (Montserrado, Grand Bassa, Margibi, Nimba, and Bong). Applying for more than one county is optional based on capacity.
Target population
Under LIT, EDC will target 3,000 AE learners for the life of the project as per the breakdown below. Under this RFP, EDC intends to reach 600 AE learners in 2026-2027. Targeted youth should be over-aged youth in existing AE secondary schools and out-of-school youth interested in re-enrolling in formal schooling, either junior high or senior high schools, or TVET and skills building program that enhance their paths to employment. At a minimum, seventy percent (70%) of targeted learners should be female, and five percent (5%) of learners should be youth with disabilities. an
| Period | Target |
| 2026-2027 | 600 |
| 2027-2028 | 1,000 |
| 2028-2029 | 1,400 |
| Total target for the life of the project | 3,000 |
Illustrative AE outcomes, tailored to youth profiles
Illustrative AE package, tailored to youth profiles. The list below forms the basis of the AE package. However, EDC, along with selected partners, will co-create and validate the package that will be delivered.
Upper Basic (7-9 grade) AE students (5 months)
Secondary (10-12) AE students and/or in TVETs (7 months)
Package for out-of-school learners (6 months)
Illustrative Activities of the AE Intervention
This section outlines the specific activities to be implemented under the subaward. To accomplish these activities, Implementing Partners will engage/coordinate with the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Youth and Sports, other governmental Ministries and agencies, and organizations involved with Alternative Education Activities at the community, district, and county levels. However, applicants can propose additional activities that support the delivery and objectives of the AE.
Activity 1 – Identify and verify Alternative Education schools/TVET Institutions to work with as well as participants to benefit from the AE program, assess needs, and validate AE package
Activity 2: Identify/review/adapt AE contents and prepare for AE trainings
Activity 3 – Organize and conduct training for selected AE learners
Activity 4 – Provide Post-Training Transition Support to overaged and out-of-school youth:
Activity 5 supports secondary school graduates into market driven initiatives
Upper Basic (7-9) Grade Students
| Curriculum | Content | Anticipated Time | Frequency | Duration |
| Work Ready Now (Soft Skills Only)
Academic tutoring in STEM and Literacy | To Be Decided
To be determined – butapplicants can propose based on their experience | 42 Hours
To be decided
(Offerors can make suggestions, which will be validated upon selection and co-creation) | 45Mins, 2 Days Weekly
To be decided | 7 months
Along the academic calendar, but to be determined by students’ needs |
Secondary (10-12) Grade Students
| Curriculum | Content | Anticipated Time | Frequency | Duration |
| Work Ready Now!
Tutoring in STEM and Literacy | To Be Decided
To be decided | 42 Hours
To be decided
| 45Mins, 2 Days Weekly
To be decided later | 7 months
Along the academic calendar, but it will be determined by students’ needs |
| Post Training Activities | Work-Based Learning, Coaching Support to Entrepreneurs & Skills Training | to be determined during the co-creation with selected partners | to be determined during the co-creation with selected partners | 2 Months |
Out-of-School Youth
| Curriculum | Content | Anticipated Time | Frequency | Duration |
| Work Ready Now! | To be decided – applicants can propose, but will be determined upon selection and co-creation | 96 hours | Up to three hours, 3 Days Weekly (schedule to be validated upon selection and co-creation | Up to 4 months
|
| Post Training Activities | Work-Based Learning, Business coaching to entrepreneur and/or skill Training & | To be determined during the co-creation with selected partners | to be determined during the co-creation with selected partners | Up to 3 Months |
| Support for youth to return to school |
Activity 6 – Monitoring the Training
Activity 7 – Strengthen, support, and participate in Leaders in Teaching TWG meetings:
Activity 8 – Track and Report Youth Results:
Activity 9 – Participation in LIT Technical working groups and other Coordination Meetings
Organizations will manage project coordination primarily through their project staff, who shall have varying degrees of responsibility as provided for in the staffing plan. In addition, they will work closely with the EDC (LIT) team as well as other implementing partners, and the MOE, who will lead and support national and local level engagements. For Learning and adapting purposes, organizations will attend monthly or Quarterly Technical work group coordination meetings at the central, county, and district levels, coordination and learning sessions, as well as other capacity-building sessions organized by the EDC/Leaders in Teaching. Other ad hoc meetings may be requested to support grantees.
4.1.2 Delivery Location
The selected Offeror(s) must deliver the deliverables to Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) to the full address of the receiving EDC office.
4.1.3 Warranty
All Offerors must provide a document with a proposed or applicable warranty for each of the deliverables in order for their proposal to be reviewed. In addition to any other express or implied warranties, Offerors must expressly warrant that:
The warranties set forth shall not be waived by reason of the acceptance of deliverables or payment therefore by EDC.
4.2 Travel
4.2.1 Travel
All Offerors must provide a table of proposed travel in order for their proposal to be considered. If the selected Offeror will not need to travel, please state this in the proposal.
Proposals must be submitted in English.
5.1. Technical Proposal Requirements
All proposals in response to this RFP must include the following:
5.2 Price Proposal Requirements
All Offerors must submit a cost breakdown for completing the work described in this RFP. In response to this RFP, EDC anticipates issuing a Fixed Price, Advance and Reconciliation contract. The price proposal must be in US dollars. All Offerors must provide a price guarantee that the proposal price remains valid for 120 days.
Offerors must provide a price summary as displayed below, as well as budget notes describing how the price was calculated. Applicants should propose alternative education services to youths as is feasible, with a ceiling of 400 USD costs per youth, which should include both participants’ supported costs and overheads. Therefore, the submitted budget should be determined by the proposed number of youths. LIT expects these grants to enhance, expand, or scale up existing activities rather than finance an entirely new activity. The applicant is encouraged to identify leverage opportunities or complementary funding, in-kind and/or community contributions to maximize impacts. This is a cost estimate per youth and is subject to the availability of funds. Revealing the range of EDC’s cost estimate for the contract does not mean that Offerors should necessarily strive to meet the maximum amount. The price summary must be submitted in Microsoft Excel format and show all formulas.
The price summary, detailed budget, and all discussion of costs, including the budget notes, must be organized consistently with the cost categories specified below. If there is no proposed cost in a particular category, include 0 for that category.
| Price Summary | Amount | Budget Notes |
| Salary and Wages | ||
| Fringe Benefits | ||
| Consultants | ||
| Travel, Transportation, Per Diem, and Miscellaneous Travel Costs (Visas, inoculations, etc.) | ||
| Equipment and supplies | ||
| Training Costs | ||
| Post-training support costs (if applicable) | ||
| Any Other Direct Cost | ||
| Total Cost (Direct Labor Plus Other Direct Costs) |
5.2.2 Detailed Budget & Budget Narrative
The detailed budget must be submitted in Microsoft Excel format and show:
Budget notes should explain each cost associated with the applicant’s budget. A budget notes template has been included as an Annex to the RFP for the applicants’ use (Annex C). Budget Notes describe what each line item is and how it will be used, and the basis of the estimated unit cost. The budget notes must state assumptions and all information that will show exactly how an amount was arrived at. All proposed costs and estimates must be reasonable and allowable in accordance with the Cost Principles. All proposed costs must be directly applicable to performing the work under the award, and budgeted amounts should not exceed the market cost/value of an item or service. Failure to provide sufficient detail here may disqualify or delay consideration of the proposal.
The budget notes should clearly describe the project and cost assumptions for the Mastercard Foundation leaders in Teaching funded costs:
One or more fixed price contracts may be awarded in response to this RFP.
EDC reserves the right to require the Offeror to provide a performance security or a bank guarantee.
In order for their proposal to be considered, the Offeror must complete and submit the Organizational Information and Certification Form, which is included as Annex A to this RFP, and submit all the attachments required by the form.
Please review the budget template format below and submit it in the exact format as a separate Excel document..
Annex D— Additional Technical/Programmatic Forms and Information
Proposed Activity Description/program components and expected results
In a maximum of 5 pages, the applicant should describe the specific activities they propose to undertake. The proposal should explain the specific expected results that will be achieved and how this will contribute to achieving LIT’s goals. The applicant should include the following sections:
Annex B: RFP Checklist for Proposals for the Procurement of
Alternative Education Training Services in Liberia
Please check the boxes in the column entitled “Submitted” to ensure inclusion of all items in your submission.
| # | Items to be included with the proposal | Submitted | Notes |
| 1 | Articles of Incorporation (copy) | ☐ | |
| 2 | Letter of Accreditation, Existing Tax Identification Number, etc. in Liberia (copies) | ☐ | |
| 3 | Current tax compliance certificate & payment of Staff Social Security (copies) | ☐ | |
| 4 | Evidence of Past Experience: · Experience working with either MOE and/or MOYS with current sectoral clearance · Experience working with youth, including young women (experience working with persons with disabilities is preferred) · Demonstrated capacity to deliver Alternative Education training and employment transition pathways · Experience in private sector engagement to create a partnership for youth employment | ☐ | |
| 5 | A current list of the board of directors (full names of all members and the most recent meeting minutes). | ☐ | |
| 6 | Legal bank account in operation (correct Bank Account details) | ☐ | |
| 7 | Complete Technical Proposal – refer to Sections 4.1, 5.1, and Annex D of this RFP | ☐ | |
| 8 | Annex C – Cost Proposal that includes Price Summary, Budget, and Budget notes in Excel. To request an Excel template, please email LITinfo@edc.org | ☐ | |
| 9 | Annex A – Organizational Information and Certification (Completed and Signed). | ☐ |
Annex C— Price Proposal and Budget Notes Template
Please email LITinfo@edc.org to request the Excel template
Annex A—Organizational Information and Certification Form
The Offeror must ensure that this form is duly completed and correctly executed by an authorized officer of the Offeror’s company.
A1. Organizational Information
Full legal name of the Offeror’s company:
Year the Offeror’s company was established:
Contact information regarding the proposal:
Offeror’s Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Code [1]:
The Offeror certifies, by checking the applicable box(es), that:
The Offeror is a non-U.S. entity, and it operates as:
a corporation organized under the laws of (country name),
an individual,
a partnership,
a nongovernmental nonprofit organization,
a nongovernmental educational institution,
a governmental organization,
an international organization, or
a joint venture.
A2. References
Please list the names, email addresses, phone numbers, and contact people at three organizations to which the Offeror has provided services of a similar or larger size and scope during the last 3 years, whom EDC can call on as references, and a description of the services provided to each organization. It is recommended that the Offeror alert the contacts that their names have been submitted and that they are authorized to provide performance information if requested by EDC.
Reference #1:
Organization Name:
Contact Person:
Email Address:
Telephone Number:
Type of Services Provided:
Value of the Services Provided:
Month and Year During Which Services were Provided:
Reference #2:
Organization Name:
Contact Person:
Email Address:
Telephone Number:
Type of Services Provided:
Value of the Services Provided:
Month and Year During Which Services were Provided:
Reference #3:
Organization Name:
Contact Person:
Email Address:
Telephone Number:
Type of Services Provided:
Value of the Services Provided:
Month and Year During Which Services were Provided:
A3. Incorporation, Registration, and Litigation
The following documents must be included in your proposal.
Documentation showing the Offeror’s current legal incorporation, including articles of incorporation, in the country in which it is incorporated:
Attached
A copy of the Offeror’s current accreditation and active registration in Liberia, demonstrating that the organization can legally operate in Liberia.
Attached
A document showing the Offeror’s most recent tax clearance from the Liberian Revenue Authority.
Attached
A document showing the Offeror’s board members.
Attached
Documents showing the Offeror’s most recent financial audits, if available.
Attached
The organization has not conducted an audit
Information regarding any current lawsuits, legal proceedings, court cases, or other litigation in which the Offeror, or any of the entities in the collaboration, is involved, regardless of the jurisdiction where the litigation resides.
Attached
Offeror certifies that it is not currently involved in any lawsuits, legal proceedings, court cases, or other litigation.
A4. Key Individuals
The names and titles of the Offerors’ key individuals are:
(a) the principal officers of the organization’s governing body (e.g., chairman, vice chairman, treasurer, and secretary of the board of directors or board of trustees):
(b) the principal officer and deputy principal officer of the organization (e.g., executive director, deputy director, president, vice president):
(c) the program manager(s) for the proposed contract:
(d) any other person who will have significant responsibilities for the administration of the US Government-financed activities or resources under the proposed delivery of the services:
A5. Awareness and Agreement to the Content of this RFP
By signing this form, the Offeror attests to its awareness and agreement to the content of this RFP and all accompanying calendar schedules and terms and provisions contained herein, including but not limited to the payment terms in Section 6.
A6. Compliance With Applicable Laws and Regulations
By signing this form, the Offeror agrees to comply with all applicable U.S. and Liberian federal laws and regulations. Offeror hereby certifies that it is not delinquent on any taxes. Offeror will cooperate with EDC in its efforts to comply with all laws, regulations, and any award terms and conditions imposed by EDC by the sponsor(s) of this project.
A7. Debarment and Suspension
The Offeror further certifies that their firm (check one):
IS
IS NOT
currently debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by any United States federal entity. The undersigned agree to notify EDC of any change in this status, should one occur, until such time as an award has been made under this procurement action.
A8. Proposal Validity
This proposal is submitted in response to an RFP issued by EDC. The undersigned is a duly authorized officer and hereby certifies that:
(Offeror Name)
agrees to be bound by the content of this Technical and Cost Proposal and agrees to comply with the terms, conditions, and provisions of the referenced RFP. The proposal shall remain in effect for a period of 120 calendar days as of the Due Date of the RFP.
A9. Authorized Negotiators
Person[s] authorized to negotiate on behalf of this firm for purposes of this RFP are:
| Name: | Title: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | ||
| Name: | Title: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
A10. Signature
Signature of Authorized Officer:
| Name: | Title: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
Attachment C – Professional Services Agreement General Terms and Conditions
[Terms and Conditions are subject to change at the time of contracting]
Provider hereby acknowledges and agrees that travel poses inherent dangers, including but not limited to criminal or terrorist acts and exposure to endemic diseases. Provider acknowledges and agrees that EDC has made no representation concerning Provider’s safety while on travel for EDC. Provider assumes all responsibility for understanding the inherent risks and any injury or damage that might result.
Provider is obligated to understand the rules and regulations that govern this Agreement. Provider will cooperate with EDC in its efforts to comply with all laws, regulations, and any award terms and conditions imposed on EDC by the sponsor(s) of this project.
See Below Annex A and use the format for the Proposal Template.
Annex A
Mastercard Foundation Leaders in Teaching
Contract Proposal Form
for LIT-AE-RFA-0002-2026
Instructions:
Prospective applicants are required to thoroughly review document LIT-AE-RFA-0002-2026 in its entirety and provide a comprehensive response addressing all stipulated requirements. Please be advised that a Contract Proposal lacking any of the specified information may be subject to rejection and may not be considered for funding. If applicants opt to proceed, they are welcome to complete the Contract Proposal Form.
Kindly note that all expenses related to the preparation and submission of a proposal are the sole responsibility of the applicant. Costs incurred in the preparation of proposals will not be subject to reimbursement. It is important to acknowledge that EDC retains the discretion to decline funding for any or all proposals, and such decisions may be made without providing any explanation.
Section 1 – Proposal Cover Sheet
Name of applying organization:
|
|
Location and telephone number of the office of the applying organization:
|
|
Name and contact information of the President or the Owner, or the Executive Director:
|
|
Name and email address, contact information for routine correspondence regarding the proposal:
|
|
Name and contact information for the Treasurer or other Authorized Representative who is the person legally responsible for receiving contract funds should such an award be made:
|
|
List of Board of Directors:
|
|
Section 2 – Organization History and Capacity (1 page maximum). Provide a narrative description of the organization’s mission, history, capacity, and main activities: Describe the organization’s history and capacity in youth development, livelihood support, particular industries, management, and finances; and other relevant topics as deemed relevant by the applicant.
|
|
Section 3 – Proposed Activity Description/program components and expected results (5 pages maximum). To ensure that your proposal provides all the requested information, refer to the specific details found in LIT-AE-RFA-0002-2026.
Technical Approach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 5 – Sustainability Plan (1 page maximum). Describe if and how you propose to continue this sort of work after funding from Youth Advance ends. Are there any plans to expand to other districts or more beneficiaries?
|
|
Section 6 – Management and Staffing Plan (1 page maximum). Explain who will manage the project and staffing/positions involved in the project, and provide a short description of assigned responsibilities.
|
|
Section 7 – Project Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (2 page maximum). Describe your staffing, mechanisms, and procedures for monitoring and reporting activities to ensure that they occur as planned and that they remain directed towards the program objectives. Also describe experience administering quantitative surveys and learning assessments, and conducting qualitative research.
|
|
Section 8 – Budget and Budget Narrative
See the separate templates provided as Annex C
Section 9 – References
Please complete the following reference form, and please provide references for where your organization has provided similar activities.
Reference #1:
Organization Name: ______________________________________________________________
Contact Person: _________________________________________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________
Type of activities or services
provided: ____________________________________________________
Value of activities or services
Provided: ____________________________________________________
Month/s and years during which activities or services were
Provided: ____________________________
Reference #2:
Organization Name: ______________________________________________________________
Contact Person: _________________________________________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________
Type of activities or services
Provided: _____________________________________________________
Value of activities or services
Provided: ____________________________________________________
Month/s and years during which activities or services were
Provided: ____________________________
Reference #3:
Organization Name: ______________________________________________________________
Contact Person: _________________________________________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________
Type of activities or services
Provided: _____________________________________________________
Value of activities and services
Provided: ____________________________________________________
Month/s and years during which activities or services
Provided: ________________
[1]Offerors that currently have a UEI Code are requested to provide this information. Offerors who are not registered may do so at https://sam.gov/content/duns-uei. There is no charge for this registration. A UEI Code is not required for submission of a quotation but may be required before a contract is issued. Whether or not an Offeror currently has a UEI code will not affect the evaluation of the Offeror’s quotation